This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van Heekeren, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

‘Don’t Tell the Crocodile’

An Existentialist View of Melanesian Myth

University of Newcastle, Australia

This article explores the relationship between Heidegger’s phenomenological ontology and Maurice Leenhardt’s ethnographic study of New Caledonia. For Leenhardt, the kamo, or authentic person, was a participatory personage existing in relationship with other humans, with nature and with mythic beings. He used the term mythe vécu (living myth) to argue for an under-standing of myth that was grounded in experience, rather than narrative, and to elaborate his understanding of a uniquely Melanesian mode of Being. I argue that, as well as echoing some of Heidegger’s insights, Leenhardt’s view of mythic consciousness has much in common with Sartre’s analysis of emotional consciousness. The ‘experience’ I refer to in this discussion is that of the Hula, on the south-east coast of Papua New Guinea. Drawing also on some other Melanesian ethnography, I suggest that an existentialist perspective not only extends the relevance of Leenhardt’s interpretation of myth but also constitutes an important development in our understanding of Melanesian ontology.

Key Words: emotional experience • existential philosophy • Melanesia • mythic participation • ontology • phenomenology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?