Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critique of Anthropology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vargas-Cetina, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Anthropology and Cooperatives

From the Community Paradigm to the Ephemeral Association in Chiapas, Mexico

Gabriela Vargas-Cetina

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mexico, gabyvargasc{at}prodigy.net.mx, gvcetina{at}tunku.uady.mx

This article, inspired by June Nash’s provocative vision of postmodern times in Chiapas, looks at how anthropologists have traced the changing nature of grassroots organizations to suggest that we need to see cooperatives and other local organizations in a new way, as ephemeral associations. Through the example of how the cooperative imaginary has informed different development programs in Mexico’s recent history, from the early cooperative movement in the 19th century to the 21st century, it explores the idea that the institutional arrangements of the recent past have given way to a state of constant flux. A new volatility is at the heart of both the organizations and their surrounding environment, so that local organizations now have to re-invent themselves constantly, to keep up with global and local changes. Through a case study of weavers’ cooperatives in Chiapas, the article points at their internal flexibility and fragility in the current climate of little support for the projects and activities of rural producers and the urban poor.

Key Words: anthropology • Chiapas • cooperatives • grassroots organizations • Mexico

Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 229-251 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X05055210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
H. Mintzberg and N. Srinivas
Juxtaposing doers and helpers in development
Community Dev. J., March 4, 2009; (2009) bsp002v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
J. F. Collins
Public Health, Patronage and National Culture: The Resuscitation and Commodification of Community Origins in Neoliberal Brazil
Critique of Anthropology, June 1, 2008; 28(2): 237 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]