Critique of Anthropology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rebel, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 431-447 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X07084236

Historical Anthropology as an Ethical Choice in an Age of Genocide

Hermann Rebel

University of Arizona, hrebel{at}email.arizona.edu

{blacksquare} A consideration of Bill Roseberry's reception of aspects of Clifford Geertz's analytical ethics, this article focuses on concepts of hegemony and counter-hegemony as alternatives to the `thick concept' approach that continues to inform, both directly and indirectly, historical narratives in anthropology.

Key Words: counter-hegemony • genocide • hegemony • postmodernity • social science ethics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?