Critique of Anthropology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krotz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 237-251 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X9701700302
© 1997 SAGE Publications

Anthropologies of the South

Their rise, their silencing, their characteristics

Esteban Krotz

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán and Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (Mexico)

{blacksquare} Traditionally, the southern part of the world has been considered largely as the privileged field for anthropological research carried out from the perspective of the North, where anthropology had its roots as a scientific disci pline. There is still little awareness that in the South an increasing number of particular anthropological traditions has emerged and consolidated during the last decades. This article tries to identify the principal reasons for the silencing of these processes and to point out some important elements for the charac terization of the new 'anthropologies of the South'. Their study will not only be a contribution to the knowledge of specific traditions of culture contact and anthropological sciences, but also to that of worldwide anthropology of which these specific anthropologies are a part.

Key Words: anthropologies of the South • [actual/recent] anthropological theory • globalization of (anthropological) science • history of anthropology • production of anthropological knowledge


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
G. L. Ribeiro
World Anthropologies: Cosmopolitics for a New Global Scenario in Anthropology
Critique of Anthropology, December 1, 2006; 26(4): 363 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
E. Krotz
Responses to '"Other Anthropologies and Anthropology Otherwise": Steps to a World Anthropologies Framework' by Eduardo Restrepo and Arturo Escobar (June, 2005)
Critique of Anthropology, December 1, 2006; 26(4): 478 - 483.
[PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
E. Krotz
Towards Unity in Diversity in World Anthropology
Critique of Anthropology, June 1, 2006; 26(2): 233 - 238.
[PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
E. Restrepo and A. Escobar
'Other Anthropologies and Anthropology Otherwise': Steps to a World Anthropologies Framework
Critique of Anthropology, June 1, 2005; 25(2): 99 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
K. K. Prah
North/South Parallels and Intersections: Anthropological convergences and divergences in the study of Africa
Critique of Anthropology, December 1, 1997; 17(4): 439 - 445.
[PDF]


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
Kwesi Kwaa Prah
North/South Parallels and Intersections: Anthropological convergences and divergences in the study of Africa
Critique of Anthropology, January 1, 1997; 17(2): 439 - 445.
[PDF]